Kiki's Delivery Service aka 魔女の宅急便 (1989):
An easy psychological test for weeding out people with whom something is
dangerously wrong is finding out their opinion about Studio Ghibli movies,
particularly classic ones like this directed by the great Hayao Miyazaki. If one
doesn’t like these films they are not to be trusted.
The particular beauty of Kiki is how easily Miyazaki turns what
would in lesser hands be a very rote story of growing up with very obvious
valuable lessons to learn into a tale that’s not just charming as all get out
but also suggests complexities in the character of its (barely) teen witch
protagonist as well as in the world around her, never treating the elements that
have clear metaphorical uses only as metaphor and never pretending inner or
outer life were simple.
Mary and the Witch’s Flower aka メアリと魔女の花 (2017): While also
pretty damn charming and imaginative for most of its running time, not quite on
the level of classic Ghibli is this Mary Stewart adaptation by former
Ghibli director (and owner of a particularly impressive name) Hiromasa
Yonebayashi. It is a lovely example of the art of all ages anime, don’t get me
wrong, it just becomes somewhat lesser in the direct comparison the very
Ghibli-like style of the production can’t help but invite. The difference here
really is a comparative lack of that internal complexity I just praised
Kiki for, Mary’s process of growing up never suggesting more than the
most superficial internal struggle adding to the outer one, and a world that
simply feels a bit flatter and simpler then in the best anime of this style.
Your Name aka 君の名は。(2016): Your Name’s director
Makoto Shinkai has made at least one film very much beholden to the Ghibli
style, too, to not terribly great effect, if I remember right, but at least this
film is not at all interested in that comparison but goes aesthetic and
philosophical ways all of its own. On paper, this is a bit of a science
fictional romance weepie – and weep indeed I did watching it – so you could
accuse it of focussing on emotional manipulation. However, it manipulates the
audience’s emotions for good, perfectly encapsulating a feeling of emotionally
big young love from afar, while also thinking surprisingly deeply about
questions of fate and random chance, the gravity of distance (in a way only
possible in the genres of the fantastic) and about the responsibilities of being
human. These thematic concerns are all effectively wrapped in a lot of
tear-stained hankies, while also presenting a true sense of awe about the world
as well as about the human heart.
Saturday, December 14, 2019
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment