Through the transformation of the glorious WTF-Films into the even more
glorious Exploder
Button and the ensuing server changes, some of my old columns for
the site have gone the way of all things internet. I’m going to repost them here
in irregular intervals in addition to my usual ramblings.
Please keep in mind these are the old posts presented with only
basic re-writes and improvements. Furthermore, many of these pieces were
written years ago, so if you feel offended or need to violently disagree with me
in the comments, you can be pretty sure I won’t know why I wrote what I wrote
anymore anyhow.
A gang of four white men wearing blackface raids a village somewhere in the
jungles of Africa – a part of Africa that seems to still lie under British
colonial rule. While stealing some crates of explosives, the assailants also
show no compunction against killing two men.
The deed happened in the territory where Tarzan (Gordon Scott) makes his
home, and the fur-shorted one follows the men upriver to enact the Law of the
Jungle on them. To add a bit of piquancy, the leader of the criminals, Slade
(Anthony Quayle), is an old enemy of Tarzan’s (“I would have killed him, if not
for the Law of Man”), and a bit of a brutal crazy thrill-seeker. Tarzan’s
hunting job is complicated when he saves tough-talking Angie (Sara Shane) from a
plane crash she suffers when she’s trying to impress him, and while Angie isn’t
exactly the proverbial damsel in distress, she’s also not Sheena. Though she
does appreciate a good nearly naked barbarian like Tarzan when she meets
him.
With Tarzan ever closing in behind him, Slade has his own problems. He needed
the explosives he stole to work an illegal diamond mine he has discovered, but
his men – Irish thug O’Bannion (Sean “The Irishman” Connery), river boat captain
Dino (Al Mulock) and diamond miner Krieger (Niall McGinnis) – and his girlfriend
Toni (Scilla Gabel) are a rather problematic bunch that does half of his work
for Tarzan. Shouldn’t you start on the infighting only after you’ve
actually acquired your loot? These people disagree, and it’s quite probable
they’d kill each other off quite without Tarzan’s help.
I’ve not been seeking out any of the Tarzan movies during these last few
decades, for in my memory, I had the films pegged as more or less exclusively
family friendly fare containing more chimpanzee shenanigans than jungle
variations of Treasure of the Sierra Madre, and seldom taking on the
Lost Race stories and general strangeness of Edgar Rice Burroughs’s
books. John Guillermin’s fifth film of the Gordon Scott-starring Tarzan
series turns out to be a noirish adventure movie rather than chimpanzee action,
however, and of highly doubtful family friendliness, particularly for the time
it was made in. To drive the point home, there’s an early scene where Tarzan
leaves Cheetah behind at home that is an early signal (well, after the murders)
what kind of film this is going to be.
Tarzan here is less the noble savage than a man who spends his life living a
particular style of barbarism by choice. The film seems not completely sure if
Tarzan’s brand of barbarism is really all that much different from the more
civilized forms of barbarism Slade and his men stand for. It does, at least, not
seem very satisfied when Tarzan finally conquers Slade, and quite dubious about
the act’s morals, and looks equally askance at his rejection (after they quite
obviously had sex, though) of Angie.
It’s only fitting in a film that spends about half of its running time on
Tarzan’s antagonists, sure-handedly and effectively hitting all the beats of
hard-boiled movies about small groups of criminals coming to blows, until the
jungle, or Tarzan (this is probably the only film I’ll ever see where Sean
Connery is killed with bow and arrow by Tarzan), or one of their own partners
kills them. The film is really rather ruthless in its set-ups here, repeatedly
demonstrating a hard edge that makes it impossible to not see this as the
hard-boiled adventure film it was meant to be.
Guillermin isn’t only particularly good at directing his very competent cast
in their scenes of infighting, he also gives the action itself a much harder
edge than I would have expected from a Tarzan film. It’s not just that people
actually bleed here, but the violence seems more brutish than you’d expect from
any late 50s adventure movie, with a handful of moments I found rather
astonishing in their directness. Guillermin really understands how to stage the
action too, keeping a film that takes place in a mix of actual location shots
and obvious sound stages quite dynamic, with much more movement than you’d
usually see in the often stiff low budget adventure movies of this time and
age.
Angie’s role in the film also comes as a bit of a surprise. While she does
need rescuing by Tarzan from time to time, she isn’t a helpless, whining doll,
with most of the dangers she gets herself into being the kind of thing someone
who isn’t used to jungle survival would believably wander into, the film never
suggesting she gets in trouble because she’s a woman. For someone who is
basically an “adventuress”, to keep with the parlance of the time, the film
treats her quite sympathetic too, even subtly suggesting that a woman with
actual experiences of life would make a good partner – in the actual meaning of
the word – for Tarzan, and mildly shaking his head at him for pushing her away
to continue a jungle life the film is already dubious about too.
For how different is Tarzan truly from a violent thrill seeker like Quayle,
once you get to counting the bodies either man leaves behind? Guillermin
emphasises this question with some interesting variations on classical Tarzan
elements. Here, Tarzan’s trademark yodel is not a quaint gimmick, but an
expression of the wildness that lies at the core of the character, used just
once at a dramatic moment that makes it that much more memorable and, if you
think about it, even rather horrifying. Which, come to think of it, is not
something I ever expected to write about a yodel, or in the context of a Tarzan
movie.
Friday, December 13, 2019
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment