Showing posts with label steven c. miller. Show all posts
Showing posts with label steven c. miller. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 29, 2025

Three Films Make A Post: Even if I kill you, I won't forget.

Werewolves (2024): This werewolf plague movie by Steven C. Miller is absolutely a SyFy original movie script of the style before these films discovered “irony” someone threw a bit of money at. As such, it is pretty dumb, doesn’t think about any of the actual implications – the mind-breaking horror and utter trauma - of its set-up that would make for a more interesting movie, and instead turns into a Frank Grillo and company versus werewolves shoot ‘em up with occasional cool gore effects.

Which I’d be fine with if Miller’s direction were a bit more inspired, or a bit more dynamic, or a bit grittier instead of being workmanlike and okay, and so full of lens flare some scenes genuinely look as if someone had farted light at the screen.

Flow aka Straume (2024): If it were nothing else, this is a brilliant example how much individuality and personality can fit into unashamedly digital animation – these things really don’t all need to look like Pixar. Of course, there’s quite a bit more to Gints Zilbalodis’s tale of a cat and her increasingly large group of animal friends roaming what looks a lot like the more pleasant part of a post-climate apocalypse world. There’s no dialogue here, but a lot of expressive animal noises (watching this at home with a cat would prove interesting, I believe), and animation so emotionally expressive, I certainly wasn’t missing dialogue or voice overs.

There’s a sense of wonder as well as one of melancholia running through the film, and where its plot is at its core simple and very generic, its artistic impression is singular and individual, leaving an immense emotional impact.

Heavier Trip aka Hevimpi reissu (2024): Where the first Heavy Trip was a delightful example of a comedy about misguided but loveable enthusiasts, its sequel by original directors and writers Juuso Laatio and Jukka Vidgren is rather less successful.

Too much of the film consists of re-treads of rock music comedy standards that hit only about half of the time; everything here feels more generic than it did in the first film, less heartfelt and more professionally competent.

Which doesn’t turn this into a terrible film, just one I don’t see myself returning to very often, or at all.

Tuesday, November 8, 2022

In short: Margaux (2022)

A group of college students in their final year try to recapture the closeness of their freshmen time with a weekend together. There’s designated final girl and coding whiz Hannah (Madison Pettis), her eternal crush, nerd turned jock Drew (Jedediah Goodacre), stoner Clay (Richard Harmon, still playing a college kid), and lovers of mildly kinky sex, Kayla (Phoebe Miu) and Devon (Jordan Buhat). To make matters a bit awkward, Drew’s influencer girlfriend Lexi (Vanessa Morgan) has invited herself at the last minute, so we can get influencer jokes and a love triangle in one economic wash.

Because (alas?) these aren’t the 70s anymore, the friends aren’t spending their weekend of getting brutally murdered in a cabin in the woods, but in an incredibly advanced smart home in the woods. Unfortunately, its AI Margaux (the voice of Susan Bennett) doesn’t just torture its clients with awkward uses of cool kids language but is also heavily into serial murder.

If you’re going into Steven C. Miller’s Margaux looking for anything original, deep or intelligent, you’ll probably be sorely disappointed. If, on the other hand, you’re in for a bit of (very) dumb fun, you might have a good enough time. At least, I do have to admire how traditionalist the film is, starting with characters that are just barely modernized updates of slasher victim archetypes, through murder methods which are merrily ignoring logic and physics and ending with horrible one-liners from Margaux even the people writing late-period Freddy Krueger would have been a bit embarrassed by. The only elements here that are truly of our time are the increased number of people of colour in the cast and all of the (bad, typical) jokes about internet influencers and home automation. Which actually might be enough to get this one status as a fascinating time capsule thirty years on. Alexa, set a reminder for 2052!

Miller’s a more than decent director here, usually finding shots that make the cheapish effects (the gore’s good, though) and the low-ish budget look better than they probably deserve. Things keep moving zippily even though Margaux doesn’t really have quite enough victims for its running time and the kind of movie it is. Miller solves this problem with murder attempts and much less complicated – and sometimes pleasantly goofy - variations on traditional suspense tropes that reminded me a bit of a less complicated and clever Final Destination.

Which certainly isn’t the worst thing I could say about a bit of uncomplicated, cheap and cheery fun like Margaux.

Tuesday, September 17, 2013

Under the Bed (2012)

After having spent two years with his Aunt, undergoing psychological treatment and being home-schooled, teenager Neal Hausman (Jonny Weston) is dragged back home by his father Terry (Peter Holden). Neal had to leave home in some event involving a fire he may or may not have started that caused the death of his mother, an event the film will explain in detail much later. In any case, Terry clearly blames Neal for his wife's death.

Consequently, it's not so much Terry's idea to take his son back in, but rather that of his soon-to-be new wife Angela (Musetta Vander) who'd like to help Terry, Neal and Neal's little brother Paulie (Gattlin Griffith), who has been living with his father and her, grow back together again.

Despite Angela's - not always well thought through - efforts, there are quite a few things standing in the way of her dream of a pleasant and loving family life: namely a future husband whose reaction to psychologically troubled kids is screaming at them like an actual crazy person and rambling bullshit about normality and being a man at them. Terry's the type who loves to talk about other people having to take responsibility for their lives, something he seems particularly bad at himself. I think we're supposed to assume Terry wasn't always the jerk he is now, and the death of his wife changed him, but the film doesn't establish any visible signs of an inner conflict for him; in fact, he makes not a single loving gesture towards his children in the whole movie until the very end.

Terry himself would already be more than enough trouble for any child or teenager not coming from a family TV show but then there's the fact that Neal is as damaged as he is for an even worse reason than an emotionally abusive father. What really drove him away from home is the monster living under his bed. Even worse, once Neal was gone, it started terrorizing Paulie who didn't have anyone to help him, and is now pretty much at the end of his mental strength. From this perspective, Neal's return is the best that could have happened, for now, the brothers can face their fear (and a very real monster) together.

Steven C. Miller's Under the Bed is a bit of a frustrating film. The problem is not so much that it is a bad film, but rather that it is a pretty good film that regularly misses its opportunities for becoming great, despite cribbing whenever possible from every movie about children and teenagers having to face their supernatural monsters alone (particularly the Don't Be Afraid Of The Dark remake seems to be a favourite here).

Case in point is the way the film portrays Terry as a raging asshole who isn't so much overwhelmed by his own guilt and his inability to cope with the troubles of his children as a natural jerk bordering on a talking plot device (need to lock up your protagonists in the dark? let Terry do it!), where a father who is trying but failing instead of making no visible effort at all would fit much better into the childhood fears Neal and Paulie have to go through. This weakness also weakens Angela as a believable character. It is, after all, not too difficult to believe she's well-meaning yet inept (but can come through at the end) doing the whole parenting thing, but it's quite impossible to understand what she'd see in Terry. The not quite believable state of these central relations between the adult characters weakens the film's cause considerably.

I'm also less than enamoured by the way Miller decides to realize its monster when it comes out. I'm perfectly fine with gore but the head-ripping creature we get in the end is so much less frightening than it could or should be it's close to embarrassing. If your monster is a metaphor for childhood fears, then it damn well better be the embodiment of childhood fears, and not just another horror movie monster. Sometimes, a bit of subtlety goes a long way. It doesn't help the creature's case that it is about four times louder than anything else in the film. The connected scares aren't so much jump scares as "fear of deafness" scares, again using a bludgeon on the audience where a scalpel would be more appropriate.

On the positive side, the film's first forty minutes or so (before these problems really hit home) are a pretty believable portrait of a traumatized teen returning home full of fear and coming to realize that his greatest fears aren't just true but now threatening the only part of his family left alive he still feels a connection to. Jonny Weston and Gattlin Griffith are highly believable and effective in their roles, too, not just bringing the pain they go through to life, but also the camaraderie and the love. It's their performances that bring the best parts of Under the Bed to life, saving large parts of it from simple mediocrity.