Nancy Drew and the Hidden Staircase (2019): This is not
really a film made with my age bracket in mind at all, but as a family movie
that drags a well-worn pop culture character into contemporary times and social
mores without going the route of deconstruction, grimdarkness or irony, Katt
Shea’s film does fall into my areas of interest. The film is not just highly
effective at this but charming as hell, the sort of family film even the
childless like me would totally watch with their imaginary demon children and
can enjoy without. It’s also excellently paced, silly when it needs to be silly,
earnest when it needs to be that, clever and even mildly subversive in an
unassuming way that’s easy to miss if you blink too often. Sophia Lillis makes a
fantastic contemporary version of Nancy Drew too, projecting just the right
mixture of self-assurance, rebellious streak, intelligence, humour and family
love a modernized version of the character needs.
10 Things I Hate About You (1999): While it is not quite on
its level, Nancy Drew would probably make a great double feature with
what may very well be the best teen comedy/teen romance of the second half of
the 90s, as directed by Gil Junger and written by the sometimes unassumingly
brilliant writing team of Karen McCullah and Kirsten Smith. As everybody
probably knows, this gives Shakespeare’s “The Taming of the Shrew” a bit of an
update for the late 90s teen set, making nearly all the right decisions about
what to keep and what to discard of old Bill for its time and audience, adding
some Old Hollywood flow to the dialogue (which always endears a romantic comedy
to me), and then proceeds to charm the pants off of anyone watching with a heart
and a brain.
The thing this and Nancy Drew share is an unwillingness to pretend a
teen audience is dumb, so while it does a very crowd pleasing kind of dance, it
also contains subtleties and complexities and isn’t afraid to show and use them,
very much in the spirit of Shakespeare, the godfather of great commercial art if
ever there was one. That Julia Stiles and Heath Ledger work fantastically
together hardly needs mentioning.
Vibes (1988): But why not end this entry on a let-down,
namely Ken Kwapis’s sad attempt at doing a romance/adventure movie clearly meant
to be in the spirit of Romancing the Stone but with added psychic
powers. Jeff Goldblum, Cyndi Lauper (who would have been ordered to drop the
accent by any half-competent filmmaker) and Peter Falk do their best with what
they are given, but there’s only so much anyone can do with a comedy script
whose jokes aren’t funny, nor a romance that doesn’t know how to be
romantic.
Particularly when the not terribly funny nor romantic script is then adapted
with all the style and panache of a kitchen table (that’s the least stylish and
panach-y thing coming to my mind right now, and it’s still funnier than most of
the jokes in here), bogged down by leaden pacing and finally killed by a
disturbing lack of imagination.
Showing posts with label katt shea. Show all posts
Showing posts with label katt shea. Show all posts
Saturday, April 13, 2019
Sunday, March 6, 2016
Three Films Make A Post: SURGING SPECTACLE! ...of Savagery and Sex!
Hello Mary Lou: Prom Night II (1987): On one hand, I’m
perfectly fine with Bruce Pittman’s sequel to okay Canadian slasher Prom
Night having nothing whatsoever to do with the first one – where the hell
should it have gone from there, after all – on the other hand, the resulting mix
of possession horror and Freddy Krueger style (at times barely one step ahead of
ripping off whole scenes completely) supernatural slasher never gels into an
actual movie. Instead, we get a bunch of unfulfilled promises (you could make a
perfectly great film about guilt and punishment as spiced up by religion out of
the material), some good scenery-chewing by Michael Ironside and Wendy Lyon once
she’s possessed, and the usual bunch of murder scenes that have not much of a
thematic connection (would it really kill this sort of film to have a killer
with a theme and then go through with it instead of having people
randomly explode through their computer and other random crap?), and barely
cohere into something like an actual plot.
Starship Troopers 3: Marauders (2008): The second Star Ship Troopers sequel, this time around directed by series screenwriter Edward Neumeier, is a pretty tedious way for the series to go out. It clearly wants to connect the satirical aspirations of the first film with the B-movie thrills of the second one, but it’s even less successful with the former than the original film and sabotages the latter ambition by insisting on the former. It’s also godawfully paced, spending an astounding amount of time on things with no bearing on its actual narrative whatsoever. The whole first hour is paced and feels very much like the prologue to the actual film; the rest isn’t nearly exciting enough to make up for that failing.
Dance of the Damned (1989): Katt Shea’s late eighties neon indie vampire movie is a bit of a frustrating experience. There’s a lot of interesting stuff in this attempt to use an awkward date night (at least he seems to think it’s a date despite his early announcement to kill her at exactly 6am) between a vampire (Cyril O’Reilly) and a stripper (Starr Andreeff) to talk about broken lives but for every moment that’s emotionally resonant, for every good idea, there are two moments of 80s vampire movie pompousness, lines of dialogue that are trying oh so very hard but never achieving, and some horribly ill-advised contact lenses. Worse, what for large parts of its running time amounts to a two person play only has one good performance in Andreeff’s (who going by what she’s doing here would have deserved to go on to much better things than she actually did), with O’Reilly mostly letting his luscious 80s locks, those contact lenses and not a lot more doing his work, which just isn’t enough.
This is still a very interesting film, mind you, just not one that actually succeeds at what
Starship Troopers 3: Marauders (2008): The second Star Ship Troopers sequel, this time around directed by series screenwriter Edward Neumeier, is a pretty tedious way for the series to go out. It clearly wants to connect the satirical aspirations of the first film with the B-movie thrills of the second one, but it’s even less successful with the former than the original film and sabotages the latter ambition by insisting on the former. It’s also godawfully paced, spending an astounding amount of time on things with no bearing on its actual narrative whatsoever. The whole first hour is paced and feels very much like the prologue to the actual film; the rest isn’t nearly exciting enough to make up for that failing.
Dance of the Damned (1989): Katt Shea’s late eighties neon indie vampire movie is a bit of a frustrating experience. There’s a lot of interesting stuff in this attempt to use an awkward date night (at least he seems to think it’s a date despite his early announcement to kill her at exactly 6am) between a vampire (Cyril O’Reilly) and a stripper (Starr Andreeff) to talk about broken lives but for every moment that’s emotionally resonant, for every good idea, there are two moments of 80s vampire movie pompousness, lines of dialogue that are trying oh so very hard but never achieving, and some horribly ill-advised contact lenses. Worse, what for large parts of its running time amounts to a two person play only has one good performance in Andreeff’s (who going by what she’s doing here would have deserved to go on to much better things than she actually did), with O’Reilly mostly letting his luscious 80s locks, those contact lenses and not a lot more doing his work, which just isn’t enough.
This is still a very interesting film, mind you, just not one that actually succeeds at what
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

