Aurora (2018): Yam Laranas’s horror film about coastal inn
keeper Leana (Anne Curtis) having to cope with a terrible ship catastrophe on a
reef just outside her inn, and getting drawn into a desperate attempt tot
salvage the corpses the coast guard pretends aren’t there, is an interesting
film in the way it mixes elements of a very serious drama about poverty and how
the ship catastrophe ripples out into causing all kinds of personal catastrophes
for Leana (and others) with very matter of fact, and somewhat generic South East
Asian ghost movie tropes. The film’s at its best when it focuses on the former
elements, given Curtis – an actress with a pretty broad range – many an
opportunity to shine. The most effective horror moments are really those that
concern themselves with either the physicality of death or simply the mass of
the dead on Leana’s doorstep; the more typically generic parts of the film are
perfectly competent, but not more.
Through Black Spruce (2018): Speaking of genre films about
poverty that are at their best whenever they are not focussing on the standard
genre tropes, Don McKellar’s film concerns Cree woman Annie Bird (Tanaya Beatty
in a performance that’s as complicated as the character she’s playing under a
veneer of straightforwardness that’s clearly armour) travelling to Toronto on
the trace of her missing twin sister, and the travails of her uncle Will
(Brandon Oakes) coping with nasty people at home. It’s a slow, somewhat
ponderous film, much more interested in drawing a portray of its First Nation
characters by watching them closely in undramatic moments, interactions that
breathe the frustration of being poor, brown, pushed to the side, and accepted
as a symbol and a thing rather than a person, than in hitting the standard plot
beats in the standard moments. Consequently, while there’s nothing wrong with
the film’s more typically thrilling scenes, they do seem to distract from its
actual strengths sometimes.
10 to Midnight (1983): For my taste, this is one of the
lesser movies featuring Charles Bronson that J. Lee Thompson churned out. But
then, my tolerance for scenes of policemen whining about the horror of having to
respect the law they are supposedly protecting and the usual nonsense about the
insanity defence as an easy out is pretty damn low. To be fair, the film does
put some effort into giving Bronson an actual human motivation for faking
evidence for once. What the film’s motivation for its desperately slow middle
part is, I can’t really figure out, though.
Showing posts with label don mckellar. Show all posts
Showing posts with label don mckellar. Show all posts
Saturday, September 7, 2019
Saturday, August 19, 2017
Three Films Make A Post: BUDDY HAS AN AXE TO GRIND. A BIG AXE.
The Black Room (2016): Softcore veteran director Rolfe
Kanefsky here turns his gaze to the seldom effective genre of the softcore sex
horror comedy, delivering nothing to write home about. Nudity-wise, the film is
surprisingly restrained, probably because it managed to catch Natasha Henstridge
for the protagonist role but clearly can’t afford for her to take her kit off,
leaving the bit of sleaze it does offer in the hands of the other actresses and
Lukas Hassel. It doesn’t much matter anyhow, for the supposedly sexy bits –
apart from some pretty damn embarrassing stuff like Henstridge having her way
with a washing machine or the other way round – usually go hand in hand with the
gory bits, keeping The Black Room away from possible titillation for
anyone but the most specialized audience. Which of course would be perfectly
okay if the film had much else to offer. Alas, the plot is a bit boring, the
comedy unfunny, and while the effects are actually fine, there’s still nothing
going on here to keep one awake.
The Frighteners (1996): Of course, I just might have no sense of humour at all, for I never did find myself terribly amused by the very slapstick-y first hour or so of Peter Jackson’s final horror comedy, apart from Jeffrey Combs’s hilarious FBI agent. To me, the film’s first part is a bit of a slog, with a plot that doesn’t get going because it is permanently put on hold for funny bits that aren’t. Once the film actually does get going, and the jokes and the actually rather dark story begin to seem to belong in the same film, it’s a different matter, the film turning funny and exciting and even a bit scary.
Exotica (1994): If you look at it from a certain angle, Atom Egoyan’s film could very well be your standard erotic thriller. Of course, it’s not a thriller at all but a meditation on loss, guilt, the search for closure, degrees of obsession, the lies we tell ourselves to survive, as well as the human capacity for compassion. It is shaped – quite typical of the director – like a puzzle box or a mystery, not because Egoyan seems much interested in suspense but because understanding the film’s characters and the ways their lives intersect is not meant to be a dry movement from plot point A to point B. There are complex and complicated undercurrents to these peoples’ lives we can better understand when we don’t experience them too linearly.
Apart from letting the viewer do this rather brilliantly, Exotica is also one of Egoyan’s most beautiful films, coming by poetry and beauty and sadness without feeling to strain for them, and certainly never showing any of the tendencies to artsy bombast that have marred parts of Egoyan’s films in the last fifteen years or so.
The Frighteners (1996): Of course, I just might have no sense of humour at all, for I never did find myself terribly amused by the very slapstick-y first hour or so of Peter Jackson’s final horror comedy, apart from Jeffrey Combs’s hilarious FBI agent. To me, the film’s first part is a bit of a slog, with a plot that doesn’t get going because it is permanently put on hold for funny bits that aren’t. Once the film actually does get going, and the jokes and the actually rather dark story begin to seem to belong in the same film, it’s a different matter, the film turning funny and exciting and even a bit scary.
Exotica (1994): If you look at it from a certain angle, Atom Egoyan’s film could very well be your standard erotic thriller. Of course, it’s not a thriller at all but a meditation on loss, guilt, the search for closure, degrees of obsession, the lies we tell ourselves to survive, as well as the human capacity for compassion. It is shaped – quite typical of the director – like a puzzle box or a mystery, not because Egoyan seems much interested in suspense but because understanding the film’s characters and the ways their lives intersect is not meant to be a dry movement from plot point A to point B. There are complex and complicated undercurrents to these peoples’ lives we can better understand when we don’t experience them too linearly.
Apart from letting the viewer do this rather brilliantly, Exotica is also one of Egoyan’s most beautiful films, coming by poetry and beauty and sadness without feeling to strain for them, and certainly never showing any of the tendencies to artsy bombast that have marred parts of Egoyan’s films in the last fifteen years or so.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

