aka The Hunchback of Paris
aka The King's Avenger
aka The Yokel (seriously?)
Through the transformation of the glorious WTF-Films into the even more
glorious Exploder
Button and the ensuing server changes, some of my old columns for
the site have gone the way of all things internet. I’m going to repost them here
in irregular intervals in addition to my usual ramblings.
Please keep in mind these are the old posts presented with only
basic re-writes and improvements. Furthermore, many of these pieces were
written years ago, so if you feel offended or need to violently disagree with me
in the comments, you can be pretty sure I won’t know why I wrote what I wrote
anymore anyhow.
France in the early 18th Century, during the reign of Louis XIV. Philippe de
Nevers (Hubert Noel) and Isabelle de Caylus (Sabine Sesselmann) have secretly
married, despite traditional hatred between their families. They have already
produced one child, a baby daughter named Aurore. Isabelle has somehow managed
to hide the little girl away in the very same building where she lives with her
father. Either, Aurore is a peculiarly silent baby girl, or Isabelle's dad is a
bit deaf.
De Nevers confides the situation to his uncle, Duc Philippe de Gonzague
(Francois Chaumett), hoping Gonzague might sway the king who in turn might sway
the Marquis de Caylus towards accepting his and Isabelle's marriage.
Unfortunately, de Gonzague is not a man to be trusted, particularly since only
Philippe is standing between him and the de Nevers family fortune, so he uses an
opportunity opened by the secret of the lovers to have de Nevers and his
daughter assassinated. The fiend's men succeed in de Nevers's case but the
rather gallant and eminently helpful Henri de Lagardère and his comic relief
servant Passepoil (Bourvil) save baby Aurore and flee with her to Spain. On
their way (and afterwards) our heroes are not only hunted by whatever scoundrels
Gonzague can come up with, but also the King's men, for Gonzague has managed
to put de Nevers's death on Lagardère's head.
After some adventures and fifteen years, Aurore (now also played by Sabine
Sesselmann) has grown up into a beautiful young woman, leading to the foster
father and foster child kind of love story between her and Lagardère most modern
audiences run away from screaming, but that I'm willing to accept with a shrug
in a sixty year old film based on an even older novel.
Lagardère decides that it's time for Aurore to be able to take her rightful
place (and return to her mother so that mum can approve of a marriage for them),
and for Gonzague to get his just deserts. For some reasons, Lagardère's
plans for putting things to rights include disguising himself as an elderly
hunchback and getting a lot of hunchback back rubs from Gonzague. Now, I'm
usually not someone to look down upon anyone's kinks, but seriously, Monsieur
Lagardère, what the hell?
It's one of the more unfair aspects of genre film history that the great
French swashbucklers of the 50s are rarely seen outside the French language
space, for the best of them (at least going by the subtitled films I've seen)
stand on the same level as Hollywood's best swashbucklers of the era. It can't
have helped the films' historical position that some of the genre's best
directors in France, like Le Bossu's André Hunebelle, were particularly
disliked by the nouvelle vague filmmakers and critics. Not needing to fight the
theoretical battles of decades ago - battles which always look rather childish
and petulant to me, I have to admit - fortunately means I can enjoy the films of
the nouvelle vague directors and those of their sworn enemies.
There is, one has to admit, a certain stiffness surrounding Hunebelle's
directorial approach here, a willingness to be lavish and serious in a very
old-fashioned way that is anathema to the (in the beginning) much more
improvisational nouvelle vague style of filmmaking, as well as to any
naturalistic approaches, but it's also a natural approach to the particular kind
of escapism the swashbuckler trades in. It's a perspective that treats history
as a playground for the kind of story that tends to treat even the greatest
hardships the genre's protagonists go through with a certain levity, and that
will always end in a happy end.
If you ask me, this kind of escapism is not a bad thing, particularly because
escapism by its very nature always carries the knowledge that there's something
worth escaping from with it; showing us wish fulfilment fantasies also
means understanding what we wish for and why. The wish to see some clear good
win over some clear evil may be naive when mapped onto the complexities of real
world politics, but it is a part of human imagination whose existence can't be
denied.
Anyway, Hunebelle was quite a master at the sort of historical fantasy we
know as the swashbuckler, using the fact that he's actually filming in the
country his film takes place in (and the existence of an actual budget for his
project) to put some impressive locations and mood-setting landscape shots in a
genre that is often rather set-bound (though there are of course numerous
colourful sets on display here, too), and showing a sure hand for the
all-important timing. There's not just never a dull moment on screen but never a
moment that doesn't contain something exciting or interesting (one suspects
that's pretty much a technique Paul Feval, the author of the much-filmed novel
the book is based on, and one of the most important writers to run with the
genre after Dumas, would approve of).
Not even Bourvil's comic relief is too painful. I could rather have lived
without it, obviously, but then I never wished for him to be slowly, and
painfully tortured to death, so we can add his treatment to the film's positives
(even though I'm not a fan of the classism that can only use the "low-born" as
comic relief).
As a hero, Marais has slightly less charm and slightly more gravitas than the
Stewart Granger/Errol Flynn type of swashbuckling hero, but he does have the
all-important charisma, and looks good in his action scenes (even those parts
not done by a stunt double), which is really all you'd ever want from the hero
of a swashbuckler. It's also really funny to see people with a low tolerance for
this sort of thing squirm when Sabine Sesselmann makes lovey eyes at him but
that might just be an effect of my particular sense of humour, and my utter lack
of a moralizing backbone when it comes to love in the movies.
So please repeat after me: "If you don't come to Largardère, Lagardère will
come to you!"
Friday, June 28, 2019
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment