A couple of years ago, Samantha Caine (Geena Davis) was found with amnesia.
Today, she’s a mild-mannered school teacher, a suburban wife and mother, and
seems very happy with her lot.
Alas, a couple of things happening at now put a stop to her happiness. Her
old personality starts to surface after she gets a good hit on her head in an
accident, and her old self clearly wasn’t a very nice person, trained in all the
arts of the movie spy assassin. Which turns out to have been exactly what she
was when her old associates start trying to kill her after having seen her on TV
in a small town Christmas parade (as you know, all Shane Black films are bound
by law to take place around Christmas). At the same time, the last private
detective Samantha hired to find out who she was before her amnesia, the
decidedly shady Mitch Hennessey (Samuel L. Jackson), finds some actual clues to
her past. After Samantha, who is in truth called Charly, has fought off a first
assassination attempt, she and Mitch go on a road trip together that will
culminate in a lot of violence but will make clear who Samantha really was.
Put two lovers of excess in cinema like director Renny Harlin and writer
Shane Black together, and you do indeed get a pretty excessive film. There’s
violence I was really surprised a mainstream action film in the mid-90s got away
with, there are explosions, there are so many people killed by our protagonist
it’s difficult to describe this aspect of the film as anything but cartoonish.
However, all this excess is based on what is to my mind probably Black’s most
interesting script. It does of course contain his usual shtick about how
horrible life and people are, but he’s exploring these ideas through an at first
and outside of the action scenes very noir-ish and clever set-up that also
concerns not just Samantha’s search for identity but also asks questions about
what “identity” might even mean, and how fluent what we call our personalities
are even when amnesia doesn’t come into play. Where did “Samantha”’s ethics come
from exactly when she was birthed from the brain of a ruthless killer? This
intersection of identity and ethics is also of interest to the film when it
comes to Henessey, a guy who is as much of a con-artist as he is a private eye
now, but who finds himself drifting back towards the better man he once was at
the same time Samantha is going back towards the worse woman she was.
That exploring this through a big loud American action movie with conspiracy
elements actually works as well as it does is a little wonder. But then, it also
happens to be a fun and highly accomplished big loud American action movie
delivered with all the excessive panache Renny Harlin (at this time still the
second-best Hollywood mainstream action movie director after John McTiernan) is
best at. But, perhaps because Harlin happened to be married to Davis at the time
and really wanted to let her show off her considerable abilities after their
curious pirate movie flop together, and clearly respected Jackson’s perfect
rendition of the struggling private dick, he’s also giving the actors ample
space to shine even when they are not murdering anyone. Add the horde of
well-known faces and character actors (honestly too many to count) and you have
yourself quite a bit of substance beside the explosions.
Really, my only actual caveat when it comes to The Long Kiss Goodbye
is the set-up of a couple of its final action scenes where the wheels of the
plot mechanics become so visible, it’s impossible not use the word “lazy” to
describe the construction there. Fortunately, you’re not going to be able to
hear me complain over the sound of stuff exploding.
Sunday, May 5, 2019
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment