Or as the working title probably went, Low Effort: The Movie. Having spent a
whopping whole day recuperating from the ordeal of the first movie, and after
the film briefly pretends to have changed protagonists setting things up it
isn’t going to touch on again at all with it, Tree Gelbman (Jessica Rothe) is
again trapped in a time loop on her birthday that only ends when she’s killed by
a knife wielding killer in a baby mask. But this time, she’s also sucked into an
alternative version of her world, so a couple of things are mildly different for
her, including the identity of the killer, which will turn out to make even less
sense than that in the first one.
You’d think that adding a bit of alternative world travel to the time loop
and die set-up of Happy Death Day would automatically include
complications or ideas beyond the most functionally obvious, but returning
director Christopher Landon – now responsible (I’m using this specific word with
purpose) for the script too – clearly doesn’t want to strain his brain or the
assumed pea-sized ones of the audience too much. So the alternative world is
really only there because the film would otherwise have had to come up with
something more interesting for the killer part of the plot, and to get some
cheap sentimental kicks in that would have looked trite to old Steve Spielberg
in his most sentimental mood.
The new killer’s identity and shenanigans are treated with a perfunctory
shrug, the film never even trying to turn them into an actual threat. You could
read that as an attempt to not make the same movie again, but if the film really
wanted that, it would probably have at least attempted to replace the
mock-giallo parts of the first film with anything interesting at all, instead of
going through the same rigmarole again, just with obvious disinterest.
Frankly, I don’t have any idea what the film is supposed to be there for
beyond cashing in on the first one and turning the whole affair into a franchise
with the inevitable mid-credits sequence. There certainly aren’t any new ideas
here, or at least old ones recycled with verve. As a matter of fact, I’d say
there isn’t even an actual film here, it just looks and sounds like one.
There’s something positive in this whole mess, though: the laziness of the
sequel brings into stark contrast how well-constructed and cleverly realized the
first one actually was. Reader, I now believe I was too critical in my
assessment of the first one!
Thursday, May 23, 2019
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment