This is a re-run with only the slightest of edits, so please don’t
ask me what the heck I was thinking when I wrote any given entry into this
section.
Lucie Klavel (the fantastic Chloé Coulloud) starts a practicum with mobile
geriatric nurse Catherine Wilson (Catherine Jacob) as part of her training. One
of the patients the rather cynical Wilson visits once a day is former famous
ballet teacher Madame Jessel (Marie-Claude Pietragalla). Madame is very very
old, and not much more than a husk of a woman hovering forever between life and
death in a coma in her large, increasingly creepy, home. She is also supposed to
be very rich; if Lucie believes what Wilson tells her, there's said to be some
sort of treasure hidden away in the house, but Wilson has never found it, even
though she tried.
When Lucie tells the story to her boyfriend Will (Félix Moati), he can't help
but see himself, his brother Ben (Jérémy Kapone) and Lucie breaking into the
house and finding Jessel's treasure. Thus, they could leave their certain
futures of dead-end jobs and loveless families behind. At first, Lucie is less
than thrilled by Will's idea but some family trouble with her father and a visit
by/hallucination of her dead mother (Béatrice Dalle) change her mind. It would,
after all be a dream to just have enough money to flee and leave all troubles
behind (that's how money works, right?). If Lucie knew what the audience knows
about Wilson and her connection to a series of local child disappearances, she
probably would have second thoughts about her new life of crime, but she
doesn't.
When the trio break into Jessel's house - on Halloween night, no less - they
find rather more than they would have wished for; finding the taxidermied body
of Jessel's daughter Anna (Chloé Marcq) in a ballerina outfit in a room set up
as a grotesque, life-sized music box is just the beginning of an ordeal that
becomes increasingly surreal.
I wasn't much of a fan of Alexandre Bustillo's and Julien Maury's first film,
Inside/À l'intérieur. That film's overdose of shocking
violence was so thick, and its grotesqueness so at odds with the narrative tone
I ended up not shocked but provoked to laughter, some fine acting and the
directors' irreproachable technical abilities notwithstanding.
Livide still contains its share of physically improbable (and rather
awesome) gore, but where Inside’s sense of the grotesque and
its hyper-realist mood collided in a bad way, Livide haunts a place
between the supernatural movies of Dario Argento (whose Suspiria gets a
shout-out that suggests this as an alternative version of Mother of
Tears perhaps more fit for those disappointed by the Argento movie's
closeness to the Demoni films and other movies of that style rather
than Suspiria and Inferno; I'm one of the crazy-people who
actually liked Mother of Tears, so don't ask me, please), Fulci in his
brilliant phase, and European fairy tales in their pre-bourgeois form before the
Brothers Grimm tamed them for a more uptight audience. In that context, the
film's sense of the grotesque and the grotesquely violent is particularly
effective, for a film that does not strive to be a copy of reality can quite
pleasurably creep along paths its naturalistic brethren should eschew.
In its narrative structure Livide is a rather fascinating example of
a movie which fulfils everything that could be asked for from a very generic
horror movie while still having a mind completely of its own. Every viewer even
slightly in tune with the horror genre will of course know the comatose ballet
teacher to be anything but the mild type of living dead her permanent sleeping
habits would suggest her to be, and will expect her to do rather nasty things to
our protagonists when they break into her realm; we all know tune and words to
this particular song by heart.
However, at the same time it sings this tune, Livide isn't at all
willing to accept its simple plot set-up as an excuse to only tell us a story we
already know too well in exactly the way we expect. At first slowly, then with
increasing intensity, the film's subtext about young women living in more or
less terrible situations trying to free themselves takes control of
Livide's more generic elements; the more fantastic the film's surface
becomes, the more its symbolic level becomes an indistinguishable part of this
surface, until the film ends in a scene that's perfectly in keeping with the
fairy tales it uses for its own ends, and also completely divorced from reality
as most people see it, or expect to see in their modern horror movies.
Unexpectedly, Livide also allows itself to end on a hopeful note it can
only reach because it dares to humanize (at least one of) its monsters; freedom
- such as it is (the film seems neither painfully optimistic nor cynical about
freedom's nature) - is won from recognizing a shared humanity between monster
and human, of their outward differences, even their identities, dissolving by
way of the grotesque. Like in the literary horrors of Caitlin R. Kiernan, of
whose books Livide's treatment of the grotesque and the monstrous,
reminds me quite a bit, there's not only danger and horror to be found in facing
monsters but also beauty and (at least some kind of) truth.
In this context, it seems nearly irrelevant that Livide at the same
time also just works very well as a surreal and moody horror film, but work well
it does; it's not impossible that exactly its grounding in safe genre formulas
is what gives Livide its power.
Friday, September 4, 2020
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment