This is a re-run with only the slightest of edits, so please don’t
ask me what the heck I was thinking when I wrote any given entry into this
section.
The Peterson family – mother Laura (Sheila Kelley), father Spencer (Leland
Orser), nearly of age daughter (who’d be of age for nearly three years in my
country, and legally drinking beer for nearly five) Anna (Maika Monroe) and
teenage son Luke (Brendan Meyer) – are still grieving for the death of their
eldest son in combat in one of America’s recent wars. One day, a stranger
calling himself David (Dan Stevens) shows up at their door, introducing himself
as a war buddy of the son come to pay his respects and give them a final message
of love from him.
David might feel just a little bit off, but he’s also charming, attractive,
attentive and seems honestly interested in each family member and their
respective problems, calming the mother, buddying up to the father,
half-charming the more sceptical Anna, and helping Luke out with his bully
problems. Quickly, a short stay for a night or two turns into an unspoken and
indefinite agreement about his staying on as a live-in family friend. However,
further developments might just reveal that David’s more than he pretends to be,
and perhaps even a danger to everyone he comes into contact with, in particular
those people towards whom he has good intentions.
After my general dislike for You’re Next and my honest puzzlement
about the critical cheering – at least in horror circles – Adam Wingard’s film
got where less smug movies suffered a polite shrug, I did not expect anything
much to my tastes going into his next film The Guest. What I got,
however, is a truly excellent film that not just avoids nearly everything I
found problematic or pretty damn annoying about its predecessor but turns it
around and into an asset.
So Wingard still demonstrates an encyclopaedic knowledge of genre film
history, but where demonstrating it felt like a pointless, and rather smug,
gesture to me in You’re Next (So you’ve seen a lot of movies? So have
I. So what?), The Guest seems to be all about actually learning from
the movies that came before and then applying that knowledge to improve the film
at hand and turn it into a more effective piece and telling its story better.
Thus making an understanding of early John Carpenter, the same neon 80s
aesthetic that dominated Nicholas Winding Refn’s Drive, and all those
thrillers about mentally ill people worming themselves into bourgeois families,
a natural part of the film’s language.
While Wingard keeps being interested in a subversion of genre expectations,
his approach here goes far beyond “ironic” quotes or making a handful of obvious
changes to the formula that play better with an contemporary audience, leaving
The Guest not as a film about older movies (or even a critique of them)
but a thing standing on its own that organically uses those techniques and
effects that will best serve its purpose to tell a story of its own. A story I
have consciously been quite vague about here because I don’t want to rob anyone
of the experience of just watching this particular film for the first time
without much more than the expectations you’ll have about a genre film with its
particular set-up. Now, fortunately, this does not mean The Guest is a
film that’s all about one big plot twist, but only that all its little twists
and turns are perfectly worth experiencing on one’s own for the first time. All
too often, a film having plot twists means it will make grand, dramatic gestures
about developments that have little logical or thematic connection to what came
before in a story, whereas here, these things all feel like natural developments
and are perfectly in the flow of what came before.
It’s this flow, an organic feel, that impresses me particularly about The
Guest, a feeling that each single element in plot, design, direction and
acting truly feeds into the film as a whole, leaving one with the feeling of
having watched something of perfect inner logic, with no single element that
could disabuse one of that notion hogging the spotlight for a second too long.
So this is a film with a wonderful cast – Monroe, Stevens and Meyer are
particular high points – tight direction, often very inventive camera work and
editing, as well as a script that is much cleverer than it pretends to be, where
again all these single elements just feed into the movie as a whole. It is quite
difficult to single out any one of these elements as particularly remarkable,
not because of their quality or lack of such but because the film is so much of
one piece, looking at the single parts it is made off seems to be completely
beside the point, unless you have an academic interest in talking about
film.
Of course, in theory, that’s how all films are supposed to
work. However films where things come together quite this way and that still
make it look easy and natural, without artifice exactly thanks to their high
degree of artistry (which is by nature artificiality) aren’t exactly a dime a
dozen. Again, the early John Carpenter comes to my mind the most, and that’s
really how The Guest feels to me: a movie so great it deserves
comparison to the best.
Friday, February 21, 2020
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment