Through the transformation of the glorious WTF-Films into the even more
glorious Exploder
Button and the ensuing server changes, some of my old columns for
the site have gone the way of all things internet. I’m going to repost them here
in irregular intervals in addition to my usual ramblings.
Please keep in mind these are the old posts without any re-writes or
improvements. Furthermore, many of these pieces were written years ago, so if
you feel offended or need to violently disagree with me in the comments, you can
be pretty sure I won’t know why I wrote what I wrote anymore anyhow.
It would be easy to confuse Hong Kong police Inspector Tom (veteran actor Pai
Ying, looking a bit bored) with your run-of-the-mill cop on the edge. His boss
(Chris Dryden) at least seems to take him for one, complaining that Tom never
keeps any criminal alive. But what the film shows of the cop lets him look like
some sort of anti-Danny Lee, killing only in self-defence, being not too fond of
torture, spending his free time taking care of an orphan boy. Given these facts,
our so-called loose gun acts like the least psychopathic cop in Hong Kong
cinema, though, admittedly, the way police officers in HK movies usually act,
that's not much to say of a cop's mental health.
Tom's newest case is a series of murders of prostitutes. While the audience
knows the identity of the killer right from the start, Tom will have to spend a
few scenes not moving a facial muscle, or, as the experts call it,
"investigating". Fortunately, one of the killer's victims escapes with her life
and is willing and able to identify him. The young man doing the deeds is one
Paul Kwok (Ng Man-Hung?), who isn't quite the nice little boy he once was
anymore since he witnessed his mother killing herself in front of his eyes while
rambling about "sluts" and "tramps", a catastrophe caused by his Dad's very
obvious cheating. Now, with a witness, it should be an easy case for Tom, and
Paul should be facing a nice vacation in an institution.
Unfortunately, the young man's father (even more veteran actor Tien Feng) is
a retired gangster, and the sort of gangster without any scruples to hire one of
his old associates to kill the witness and later on (in utter stupidity) even
try for Tom's life at that. After the inevitable death of the witness, Paul goes
free again.
The only way Tom sees to still catch his man is to let a friend of one of the
victims (Gigi Wong), who also doubles as his own love interest, do some
undercover work in killer provocation.
Before Ronny Yu became Ronny Yu, the emperor of blue lights in neo-wuxia
movies, he learned the director's trade making movies in various other genres,
like this Teddy Robin Kwan-produced thriller. Even this early in his career, and
confronted with a total lack of blue lights, Yu certainly knew how to stage a
scene, use dynamic editing to ratchet up the tension at the right moment, and
set up a nice nod in the direction of Dario Argento in a staircase sequence.
Quite unlike the enthusiastic, Chor-Yuen-influenced wallowing in careful
artificiality that characterizes the visual style of Yu's films of the 90s,
The Saviour is aiming for the speedy edited type of tight
pseudo-naturalism typical of many of Hong Kong's crime films and thrillers of
the late 70s and early 80s, with only short moments of the non-realist - like
the flashbacks to the death of Paul's mother, that staircase scene, and a
handful of other moments - prefiguring at once Yu's later style and making that
style's debt to the giallo surprisingly probable. This doesn't mean that the
shots that are supposed to look spontaneous and "real" here aren't set up just
as carefully as those of a film made in a more obviously artificial style;
The Saviour certainly isn't a point-and-shoot affair, but a thoroughly
composed picture that is meant to feel thoroughly un-composed.
Most of the time, that well-constructed pseudo-naturalism works out well for
the film, that is, as long as the script plays into Yu's hands keeping things
relatively low-key and reasonably believable. Unfortunately, the construction of
the movie's final act leaves something to be desired. What starts out unoriginal
yet casually believable (as far as such things go), turns into a classic case of
an idiot plot, where the final confrontation only plays out in the supposedly
exciting way it does because the female lead seems to have suddenly misplaced
her brain and her once professional cop friends just as suddenly stop thinking
or acting like people who know what they are doing, too. This sort of thing
would rankle less in a film that never pretended to be taking place on planet
Earth as we know it, but in a film that spent most of its first hour pretending
not to want to be too sensationalist, this sudden turn for the preposterous is
more of a problem. That the script's failure at this late stage doesn't ruin the
film completely is Yu's achievement - he just pulls enough magic tricks out of
the "look, I'm DIRECTING!" hat to distract from the writing problems.
The other problems Yu needs to and does distract from throughout the movie
are the frankly bored and boring acting by Pai Ying and the decidedly
unthreatening performance by Ng Man-Hung. It's nice that they (or Yu) decided to
step back from the more typical scenery chewing found in every other film from
Hong Kong ever, but they then fell into the trap of acting so low-key they might
as well have been replaced by wooden puppets. I think I would have preferred the
scenery-chewing here.
Still, Yu's direction is stronger than his film's flaws, and though I
wouldn't recommend The Saviour as one of the director's best films, it
is well worth watching for anyone interested in Yu's early career or in the move
against the beautiful artificiality of the venerable Shaw productions taking
place in the Hong Kong movies of that era.
Friday, June 2, 2017
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment