aka Ten Little Indians
Through the transformation of the glorious WTF-Films into the even more
glorious Exploder
Button and the ensuing server changes, some of my old columns for
the site have gone the way of all things internet. I’m going to repost them here
in irregular intervals in addition to my usual ramblings.
Please keep in mind these are the old posts presented with only
basic re-writes and improvements. Furthermore, many of these pieces were
written years ago, so if you feel offended or need to violently disagree with me
in the comments, you can be pretty sure I won’t know why I wrote what I wrote
anymore anyhow.
Warning: this Soviet adaptation of Agatha Christie's novel uses the initial
title and version of the nursery rhyme that's so important for its plot, so if
you're afraid of that authentic period racism, this is not the adaptation for
you. I'll spare you the deeply problematic terminology in the review,
though.
Eight strangers - among them a retired judge (Vladimir Zeldin), a secretary
and governess (Tatyana Drubich), a former policeman (Aleksei Zharkov) and a
soldier/mercenary (Aleksandr Kaydanovskiy) - arrive at an isolated island
mansion (on what I shall call N-word Island). They all have been invited, each
guest for a different reason, by a certain U.N. Owen, a person quite unknown to
everyone. On the island, the group is awaited by a freshly hired couple of
servants (Aleksei Zolotnitsky and Irina Tershchenko), who have neither seen nor
heard their new employer. Supposedly, Owen has been held up on the mainland and
will join the party the next day.
Owen and his various promises to the various guests turn out to be lies once
dinner time arrives. A gramophone recording explains the sins of all ten guests;
everyone is responsible for the death of at least one other human being, and
everyone, the recording explains, is going to pay for their sins. Which is
exactly what happens: one after the other, the guests are killed in ways echoing
an old British nursery rhyme that just happens to be posted in everyone's room.
Soon, the guests realize they really are the only people on the island, so the
killer must be one of them. But who is it, and will they find out before
everyone's dead or broken by the situation?
I am, in general, not much of an admirer of the works of Agatha Christie. In
part, it's a problem I often have with the cozy subgenre - I just can't bring
myself to care if it was the butler or the young relative who killed Lord
Arsebutton for his money, and really, why should I? Christie's case is further
weakened by her love for perfectly annoying detectives (why isn't anyone
murdering Poirot and Miss Marple, for Cthulhu's sake?), her classism, and the
intensely improbable construction of many of her mysteries.
I do make an exception for novels like Ten Little N./Ten Little
Indians/And Then There Were None, though, because there is little
that is actually "cozy" about them - but who'd call a literary sub-genre the
"bleaky"? Ten (let's make it easy on ourselves with the title) is a
novel whose basic set-up has fascinated many a movie director, too, but some of
them have balked from giving the film its proper, grim
ending. Certainly not Soviet director Stanislav Govorukhin, whose Desyat
negrityat not just keeps all the uncomfortable elements of Christie's
original novel including its ending, but focuses on them to create the
psychologically dark period piece the novel deserves to be.
In Govorukhin's hands, the sometimes somewhat dry book turns into a
claustrophobic nightmare that at times feels like a horror film. The director
often uses consciously cramped framing - even in shots taking place outside the
house - to emphasize how the situation the murderer constructed for his victims
throws them back onto themselves, their guilt - even though not all of them
feel guilty, and this isn't a movie where a feeling of guilt saves
anyone from anything anyhow - and the pasts deeds whose consequences they can't
escape anymore, if they ever could or did. There's an incredible sense of
tension running through the movie that belies the surface talkiness of its
script (though Govorukhin knows quite well when to let his characters
stop talking, which becomes clear in the last stages of the film), the
seeming simplicity of Govorukhin's direction, and the film's length of 129
minutes. On paper, this might still sound like your typical cozy mystery plot,
but in practice, this is a film interested in, and awfully good at, exploring
the existential darkness inside of and around its characters. And, if we want to
give the film a political dimension instead of one sitting between philosophy
and psychology, can it be an accident that every character in the film - the
killer of killers being no exception - has at one point not just killed,
but killed by misusing a position of authority and trust?
The actors, especially Drubich and Kaydanovskiy, are fantastic, selling the
moments of naturalistic break-downs as well as those of heated melodrama. They -
and the script, of course - also manage to turn what could have been only a
series of vile people who get exactly what they deserve from somebody no
less vile who gets a friendly nod for it (let's call that the "Dexter hypocrisy
syndrome") into complex characters who have at one point in their lives given in
to weaknesses that - this seems to be a particularly important point for the
film - are universally human. These aren't all "bad" people, or "good" ones, or
"misunderstood" ones, but just people deserving of compassion even
though they have done horrible, or callous, or weak, things. Which, on the other
hand, doesn't mean Govorukhin is willing to pretend his characters are the sort
of people acting well under outside pressure.
The film's only weakness in my eyes lies in the construction of its plot, or
rather, how artificially constructed it is. There's a central plot point - and
we can thank Christie for that - that just beggars believe when you stop and
think about it for a second (and, to digress for a parenthesis, it is ironically
a plot point contemporary movies like the mildly diverting Saw series
seem to have fallen in love with wholesale), needing everyone still alive at a
particular moment to be outrageously dense or credulous, and the killer to be
extremely lucky and talented in the ways of the pulp yogi. However, Govorukhin's
direction is so strong I couldn't help but look with raised eyebrows at the
solution of the film's mystery, yet still be decidedly enthusiastic about the
film as a whole.
The mystery isn't the point of the film anyhow. Desyat Negrityat is
all about showing what made its characters what they are, and what they become.
Friday, November 9, 2018
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment