Original title: Maigret tend un piège
aka Woman-Bait
aka Maigret Lays a Trap
aka Inspector Maigret
A serial killer stalks the streets of Paris during a very hot summer, killing
women regularly, always right about sunset. The killer clearly knows all of the
classics, so he summons his probable nemesis, Chief Inspector Maigret (Jean
Gabin), to one of the killings via an emergency call, and seems right proud of
his job. Maigret, pretty tired and frustrated after twenty years of police work,
has the guy pegged as a show-off right quick, so he decides on various methods
to goad him, starting out with a fake public arrest of an acquainted crook, and
putting a small army of police secretaries (apparently there were no other women
in the French police at the time) of the physical type he’s going for on the
street as honey traps.
Eventually, investigative work and a bit of luck lead Maigret to a rather
curious bourgeois couple, Marcel (Jean Desailly) and Yvonne (Annie Girardot)
Maurin. Something’s clearly not right with the husband, but it will take the
Inspector some time and quite a bit of interview work to get his man.
When you’re like me, you’re used to the way US cinema of the late 50s had to
treat elements of the human existence like sexuality, the way it could only ever
suggest the facts of the lives of quite a few people without rubbing the censors
wrong. In that case, the first of two adaptations of some of the immensely
popular (and often rather excellent) Maigret novels of Georges Simenon might
just come as quite of a culture shock, for in the French version of the 50s, the
existence of gigolos is normal, the sort of thing our protagonist takes
without even raising and eyebrow, and you can even use the fact that a woman is
still a virgin after five years of marriage as a perfectly spelled out plot
point.
These are only some of the elements that make Jean Delannoy’s film sometimes
feel strangely modern. Its idea of how serial killers work is at least in part
surprisingly close to the more codified interpretations of the matter that
became popular knowledge years later. The film emphasizes the importance of the
appearance of the killer’s victims, the connection of this to his messed up
past; Maigret understands the shortening length of time between killings as
meaningful, and so on and so forth. Now, these ideas weren’t completely new for
crime film and literature – or psychology - at the time, of course, but they
weren’t yet set in stone as pop cultural base-line knowledge about these things,
nor, as far as I know, in real life. Less modern in this regard is the film
blaming the killer’s mother for his problems by basically not letting him become
manly enough, but you can’t have everything, I suppose.
Maigret’s interview methods are a lot closer to more modern ideas of how this
sort of thing works, too, his sometimes threatening, sometimes ingratiating
manner combined with psychological insight de-emphasizing the search for
practical clues and replacing it with one for motive. Particularly the
interrogation scenes work as well as they do because of a combination of
sometimes – let’s ignore the whole blaming the mother bit – incisive and
insightful writing and a fantastic performance by Gabin that starts from the
actor’s trade-mark phlegmatic air but can shift emotion and meaning lightning
quick. Gabin’s even good enough to help one overlook the lack of subtlety and
substance in Desailly’s performance as the killer Marcel, who’s really doing too
much of a rote crazy person bit for the kind of film this is. The rest of the
cast is thankfully as good as Gabin.
Delannoy’s direction of all this is elegant, sleek, and stylish, without the
noirish shadows one might expect (or hope for), but still creating a sense of
intimacy for a film that, is all about character psychology and twisted kinds of
love.
Sunday, April 29, 2018
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment