aka Vamps
Original title: Vurdalaki
Russia, some time in the 18th Century (I believe). Nobleman Andrej
(Konstantin Kryukov), an aide-de-camp of the Czar, and his cowardly comic relief
servant have travelled far from Russia’s capital to find the priest Lavr
(Mikhail Porechenkov) who has been exiled to a small village. Apparently, the
Czar has changed his mind about the man and wants him back. Lavr doesn’t want to
come, however, for the village and its surroundings are in dire need of him.
After a long absence, the local Vampire count – cape and all – has returned;
not only to rekindle his traditional reign of terror but to become a
daywalker.
His plan, as far as we will learn it, is to first re-establish a foothold in
the area and then grab and bite young, beautiful Milena (Aglaya Shilosvkaya).
Milena, you see, is a half-vampire (for once not called a dhampir here), and
once turned, she - or her blood, the film’s not terribly clear on that account
and the subtitles I watched it with are more than a little suspicious – will
provide all the daywalking power a vampire can hope for.
Fortunately for the world, Lavr is the two-fisted stake-wielding kind of
priest, and once he’s fallen in love (as is obligatory) and starts believing in
vampires, Andrej’s pretty handy at murdering bloodsuckers too. Because this was
made in the 2010s, Milena’s not a wilting violet either, so our big bad has his
work cut out for him.
Sergey Ginzburg’s Vurdalaki feels like an attempt to reconcile urban
fantasy and more traditional gothic horror – this is supposedly based
on Aleksey Konstantinovich Tolstoy’s novella “Family of the Vourdalak” like the
best episode of Bava’s Black Friday and does indeed feature some
core elements of the piece if in a changed context - for a contemporary
audience, and while I don’t think it’s a completely successful film, I do think
it is a very entertaining one certainly worth anyone’s time, showing some very
good ideas besides the half-baked ones.
The film’s main problem apart from two romantic leads who seem to be cast
more for their exceeding prettiness than for their thespian gifts - in itself of
course a tradition in much of gothic horror – is that it not always manages to
fuse the gothic mood it aptly creates –particularly in the earlier vampire
scenes - with the urban fantasy tendency to create a somewhat lame parallel
mythology that seems much too fascinated with explaining its own mechanisms. At
least, it never goes as far down the urban fantasy rabbit hole as to present a
hunky vampire special forces guy nor an eminently marriageable alpha werewolf.
Whereas the film’s urban fantasy elements really want explain themselves to you
(please don’t run away!), the gothic does of course live on the ambiguous, on
supernatural powers that aren’t clearly categorized and on a sense of doom and
dread.
I’m also not terrible happy with the big more action movie style final stand
our heroes get up to near the end. There’s a lot of excited and exciting
build-up to it, but once it actually starts, it’s short, not terribly exciting
and goes out on a whimper. It certainly doesn’t help here that the film suddenly
decides the up until then competent and active Milena shouldn’t participate in
her own final defence.
While all these problems – also adding the painful comic relief guy – are
there and accounted for, this might make Vurdalaki sound quite a bit
less enjoyable than it actually is. Particularly its first hour contains many an
effective scene in the gothic style given a Russian twist selling the feel of a
village under an invisible pall more often than not. The generally beautiful –
and by night appropriately creepy – landscape location shots certainly add to
this too.
The scenes – you can imagine which ones – that really parallel the Tolstoy
story are very effectively done, achieving an undertone of dread that might not
be Bava-esque but is certainly working well, emphasising the horror of betrayal
when family member feeds on family member without feeling the need to make it
explicit. And while the action movie tendencies sometimes feel a bit grating,
Ginzburg does have a decent eye for swashbuckling and even a cheesy heroic death
or two, so these scenes – apart from the last stand sequence – are at least fun
to watch. Plus, how many modern vampire movies remind one at least a little of
Captain Kronos?
Sunday, November 26, 2017
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment