Offerings (1989): At the tail end of the slasher cycle, one
Christopher Reynolds apparently set out to make a film that contained all other
slasher films. At least in so far as any given scene in his film is a more or
less blatant rip-off of a scene from another, mostly better, slasher, shot with
no sense of style and taste, and with actors who can’t – act, that is. While
this may sound rather tiresome, the resulting film is a surprisingly
entertaining concoction featuring nary a boring second. When you’re not gasping
in disbelief at the film’s utter shamelessness in its borrowings (even
Mattei/Fracasso would have balked at some of the stuff going on here, like the
not-Halloween parts of the score), you’re giggling about dialogue that
starts awkward and ends up really funny, or laughing about Sheriff “That Doesn’t
Look Like Sausage To me” Chism, some sort of overweight Wil Wheaton who spends
his on-screen time with things like stealing a kid’s porn magazine collection.
This may sound as if I’m mostly laughing at the movie, but when a film brings –
even unintentionally – so much joy, there’s only laughing with it.
Aaron’s Blood (2016): It’s certainly not a bad basic idea to
connect vampirism and a father’s reaction to a child’s terrible illness, but in
practice, Tommy Stovall’s treatment of the theme here just doesn’t work at all
for me. Unfortunately, the film handles the situation with a sledgehammer,
seemingly expecting that the whole “a father will do anything to protect his
child” cliché can stand in for the rest of the characterisation needed to make
the narrative actually work. Plot-wise, the film is full of improbable
coincidences – like the kid’s school caretaker and a local barkeep just
happening to be Fearless Vampire Hunters – and characters whose actions
often feel highly improbable. The film is otherwise competently shot and
decently acted, mind you, but it never did manage to convince me of the
characters at its core at all.
68 Kill (2017): Trent Haaga’s adaptation of a Bryan Smith
novel (probably one of his best, if you can stomach his stuff) as a dark comedy,
on the other hand, managed to convince me of much more improbable characters
doing much more improbable things rather well. It does help that leads Matthew
Gray Gubler and AnnaLynne McCord are diving into absurdity and violence with the
best of them.
Haaga softens Smith’s book a little in so far as he doesn’t show quite as
much of the sex, the violence and the general depravity but he does so in a way
that makes the film feel more focussed on its sad sack penis-piloted (like all
men in Smith’s stuff, unless they are pure psychos) protagonist’s plight with
various murderous, sexy, dominating, evil women (like all women in Smith’s
stuff), like noir gone a bit explicit. The film doesn’t really critique Smith’s
rather basic (and certainly problematic in more than just contemporary parlance)
concept of humanity as a whole and women in particular, but as a caustic
expression of it, it is pretty successful.
Saturday, October 7, 2017
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment