The Amazing Spider-Man 2 (2014): The second and fortunately
last of the Andrew Garfield Spider-Man films – again directed by Marc Webb –
doubles down on most of the flaws of the first film. So there’s a screenplay
made out of many bits and pieces that very often go nowhere and bloat the film
to a run-time of nearly two and a half hours for no good reason whatsoever,
character motivations that egregiously follow the needs of the script,
surprisingly mediocre special effects for a film of this type and budget, so
many nagging details that either just don’t work or don’t work in the places
where the film puts them, too many villains for the thin script or Webb’s
personality-deprived direction to handle, and so on and so forth, until the
whole thing turns into a confused slog.
Edge of Tomorrow (2014): Doug Liman’s adaptation of Hiroshi
Sakurazaka’s brilliantly titled “All You Need Is Kill” is good enough to satisfy
even the needs of a Tom Cruise hater like me. It does help that the old placenta
eater is teamed up with the generally and specifically lovely Emily Blunt, as
well as that the film early on uses Cruise’s slimy image for its own needs for a
bit. Liman also gets a decent performance out of Cruise, even managing to put a
lid on the actor’s often distracting vanity (cinematically useless heroic poses
usually being to Cruise what vaseline on the camera lens was to aging Joan
Crawford).
The script uses the good old time loop (not invented by
Groundhog Day, by the way, as much as I like all parts of that film not
Andie McDowell) structure for a fun, fast, in the early proceedings darkly funny
military SF adventure of highest entertainment value. The old SF reader in me
wants to decry the lack of actual substance, and my politics the film’s
inability to even think of any way to solve problems but violence. However,
that’s really asking of what at its core is a clever and fun adventure movie
with CGI monsters to be something it isn’t trying to do while ignoring it is
rather brilliant at what it does do.
Atomica (2017): Dagen Merrill’s – nominally SF – thriller is
certainly well meant: it is pleasantly serious in tone, obviously believes in
character as the basis for plot and clearly tries very hard. Unfortunately, it’s
just not very effective at being a thriller. There are few actual surprises, and
while the writing certainly is serious and character-based, it is also just not
very interesting and never becomes gripping or exciting in any way, shape, or
form. Visually, the film suffers from pretty bland warehouse-style sets, and
direction that never chooses anything but the most obvious way to shoot any
given scene. It’s certainly not a bad film, but I find it hard to find much more
than theoretical praise for it either.
Saturday, September 30, 2017
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment