After their experiences in Poltergeist II (which I’m not going to
write up because I just can’t cope with quite this much Magical Native
American), the Freelings must have turned into assholes, for they have left
their ghost magnet daughter Carol Anne (Heather O’Rourke) with her aunt Pat
(Nancy Allen), her hubby, rich architect Bruce (Tom Skerritt) and Bruce’s
daughter Donna (Lara Flynn Boyle) in a high rise building in Chicago that is
apparently some kind of arcology. Carol Anne is going to a school for talented
but weird kids, where the chief psychologist, one doctor Seaton (Richard Fire),
holds regular hypnosis sessions with her to prove that what happened in the
first two movies was “mass hypnosis” somehow induced by Carol Anne. Which sounds
even more ridiculous than poltergeists, so he at least deserves credits for
countering the bat-shit insane with the even crazier.
Of course, the whole thing somehow calls back ole Reverend Henry Kane (Nathan
Davis) and his crew of ghosts, who have suddenly developed the habit of
exclusively centring their hauntings around mirrors, reflections, cold and evil
doppelgangers. That’s going to become a bit of a problem, for Bruce’s high rise
is hyper-modern and built in the 80s, therefore it is full of mirrors.
Gary Sherman’s Poltergeist III generally has a rather bad reputation
but I enjoy it quite a bit more than the second film in the series. It’s not at
all on the level of the original, of course, but at least the new things it is
trying are more interesting than embarrassing, unlike what happens in film
number two.
Characterisations aren’t terribly inventive – apart from the fact that Bruce
who isn’t a blood relation clearly loves Carol Anne much more than the sister of
her mother does. Pat learning to love the girl despite Carol Anne’s intrinsic
weirdness (which you can read as a metaphor for illness or disability, if you’re
so minded) is actually pretty much what part of the film seem to want to be
about but the final twenty minutes of Poltergeist III are such a chaos
of bad writing, characters saying and doing things that make no sense
whatsoever, and plain bullshit that there’s no real pay off to the theme.
What does pay off, and what makes the first hour of the film worth
watching quite a bit, is how much of a master class on building a variety of
supernatural phenomena out of a small number of things – reflections and cold –
it is. While there’s more than enough diversity to the phenomena to avoid boring
anyone through repetition, they clearly belong to the same supernatural
theme where quite a few horror films would just randomly throw supposedly spooky
stuff at the audience. The feel of connection between various weirdnesses here
is quite effective, and some of them make for really trippy and original little
shocks and twists.
Until the film suddenly goes to a bizarre encounter in a frozen parking
garage, one of the most stupid fake happy ends in horror history in which I have
no idea why the characters are suddenly supposed to believe that things are
over, not to speak of the audience, and a series of final set pieces and
dialogue sequences that seem to have little connection to what came before, and
which are probably the fault of your usual “troubled production history”.
Which puts Poltergeist III into the rubric of interesting but
annoyingly flawed films worth watching for the good in them.
Tuesday, April 25, 2017
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment