Manborg (2011): If you want to understand the kind of movie
this Astron-6 production is, you need to imagine the fabulous video store in the
sky, where all the most bizarre elements from the cheapest post-apocalypse,
martial arts, action, videogame and probably Godfrey Ho movies have somehow
been genetically merged, turning into the mighty MANBORG, a culmination of the
art form that could not have come to pass until the 2010s because people crazy
enough to make it on the monthly budget of a not particularly rich family of
three do not fall from trees. All more concrete description would make this
sound like a Troma film, but unlike Troma, Astron-6 cares, their jokes are
actually funny, and their films not just pretend they’re fever-dream crazy, they
actually are. They’re also not feeling like parodies to me so much as the
ultimate love letters to things utterly ridiculous and therefore awesome.
Wrecker: Staying in Canada, but entering a much less
rarefied space, Micheal Bafaro’s film is an ill-advised backdoor remake of
Steven Spielberg’s Duel that really can’t survive the comparison with
the original movie. And because Spielberg’s film was a TV movie shot on a tiny
budget and on a very tight schedule, you can’t even excuse this one’s failings
with it being a low budget film. It’s just that Bafaro is no young Spielberg.
Not many directors are, of course, but then not many directors are inviting the
direct comparison this openly.
The only interesting change here is replacing Dennis Weaver’s character with
two young women (Anna Hutchison and Andrea Whitburn), but since their
interactions are not exactly riveting, and this also eats into the feeling of
isolation for the films’ respective heroes, this looks more like a film
desperately trying to do at least something differently and failing. The rest of
the affair is easily described as “Duel but bad”.
Lighthouse (1999): Our final film of the day leads us to the
UK, and while it is not the catastrophe that Wrecker is, Simon Hunter’s
film isn’t exactly exciting. Sure, there’s a lot more talent visible on screen
than in the Canadian film, but in the end, this is the ultra-generic tale of
various people in an isolated place being murdered by your usual near
supernatural psycho. Having read that description and the title, you’ll know
exactly what you’re in for, with only a handful of over-constructed suspense
scenes to distract you from the fact that there’s little reason to watch a film
quite this lacking in personality. If you’re a collector of slightly more famous
actors in early(ish) roles in (sort of) slasher movies, this one gives you James
Purefoy as “the good, potentially innocent criminal”. Other excitement is pretty
much absent.
Friday, January 8, 2016
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment